Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Clemson OL
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 4
| visibility 6

Clemson OL

11

Jul 12, 2023, 5:47 PM

I see a lot of chatter about the OL

Sure it needs to improve like all the offensive position groups, but this old buzzard thinks they were pretty good last year

They became a really good run blocking OL

Pass blocking has the most room to improve, but I think anyone that knows first thing about football X’s and O’s will tell you it’s hard to pass block with the box loaded on defense. 8 guys inside the the hashes within 3-5 yards of the LOS is really hard to block with 5 guys

Decent QB and WR play is going to make defenses play us honest and will make these guys look much much better (even though they will actually only be marginally better)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Clemson OL

4
Jul 12, 2023, 5:57 PM

Agreed!
The scheme didn't help the OL play either.
If you don't have all 5-star starters across the board; and you play a dominant D. You need something to neutralize that defense that's "built in". Tempo did that for us.
The principles that Chad Morris brought were: *built-in answers to what the defense is doing. *get the defense on it's heels and keep them there. *press the middle of the field a few times again to make sure the safety doesn't get comfortable getting in the box. *Gameplan to the defense you're playing(Scott and Elliott excelled here).

I think Scott/Elliott/Streeter kept to the formula for the most part, but after the years rolled on and we had success: "I get the sense the offensive staff maybe started feeling themselves a bit". We dropped some of those key principles and ended up "lost in the forest of offense"! Having a QB that was hard to figure out didn't help the last two years either.

The OL will be much better in short, as you said, because they will be put in better position.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

personally , OL is fine. They now have a DLine

3
Jul 12, 2023, 7:10 PM

to practice against

i can't recall how many times i saw the Breese defense never actually get to the QB . Every QB that played aclemson looked like a Hesiman candidate (only vs Clemson)


This new era of defense will a risky require the offense line to practice hard and get elite

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Clemson OL

3
Jul 12, 2023, 7:41 PM

Agreed. They did a good job run blocking. Much of the pass protection problems were due to the scheme. Plays took to long to develop, to many out patterns and not utilizing the middle of the field. The WR screen game doesn't work when D backs play close to the LOS. You need the threat of a WR going deep to get the secondary to play off of the ball. They tried it over and over when it wasn't there. Hopefully with the new scheme this O line will look awesome.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Clemson OL


Jul 12, 2023, 9:02 PM

Agreed

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 4
| visibility 6
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Merry Christmas, everyone!

by Judge Keller®

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic