|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1458
|
Game Changer [1905]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Clear Targeting in the Buck Nut game
2
Oct 26, 2024, 3:26 PM
|
|
And the Fox broadcasters are doing everything they can to protect their cash cow
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1905]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Clear Targeting in the Buck Nut game
3
Oct 26, 2024, 3:26 PM
|
|
And now they’re throwing water bottles… trash holes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [29685]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
|
Re: Clear Targeting in the Buck Nut game
4
Oct 26, 2024, 3:27 PM
|
|
Coots of the north 🤣
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [87664]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 45529
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redshirt [90]
TigerPulse: 100%
10
|
Re: Clear Targeting in the Buck Nut game
4
Oct 26, 2024, 3:32 PM
[ in reply to Re: Clear Targeting in the Buck Nut game ] |
|
PLEASE Tiger fans, no matter what happens, never, ever act like these low-class teams that throw water bottles and trash. Keep your cool and show these other low-lifes how to be true sports fans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [381]
TigerPulse: 99%
16
|
Re: Clear Targeting in the Buck Nut game
1
Oct 26, 2024, 6:23 PM
|
|
I am biased. But to me that looks like a forearm to the chest. I am going to assume it’s clear targeting because…????
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1128]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: Clear Targeting in the Buck Nut game
Oct 26, 2024, 6:37 PM
|
|
Throwing a forearm is not a football move. Throwing a forearm to the neck area is targeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [381]
TigerPulse: 99%
16
|
Re: Clear Targeting in the Buck Nut game
Oct 26, 2024, 7:20 PM
|
|
I would say forearms are used to tackle all the time. I still thing it was his chest. Again, I realize I am a little biased. The problem is no 2 refs call targeting the same which leads to all kinds of problems and confusion. This year I have seen stuff way worse not called targeting. I have seen stuff way more innocent looking called targeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1128]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: Clear Targeting in the Buck Nut game
Oct 26, 2024, 9:29 PM
|
|
Players use their arms to tackle and ,yes, the forearm is part of the arms. They tackle with the inside of the arms. The outside of the the forearm is not used as a point of contact for tackling.
Plus another player had him in his grasp, when he struck with the forearm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1128]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: Clear Targeting in the Buck Nut game
Oct 26, 2024, 9:38 PM
|
|
If he had struck him with the inside of this forearm with his arm extended, it wouldn’t have been called.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1905]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Clear Targeting in the Buck Nut game
Oct 26, 2024, 8:58 PM
[ in reply to Re: Clear Targeting in the Buck Nut game ] |
|
Maybe you’re thinking of a different play, because in the play I’m referencing the OSU player’s shoulder hit the Nebraska player’s face mask
Since targeting is defined as forcible contact with the players helmet or shoulder, to the defenseless player’s head or neck area, I thought it was clear
Page 229, rule 9-1-4 example 1 in case you’re looking for the official ruling
https://www.ncaapublications.com/productdownloads/FR24_20240724.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [381]
TigerPulse: 99%
16
|
Re: Clear Targeting in the Buck Nut game
Oct 28, 2024, 8:04 PM
|
|
The NCAA ruled it wasn’t targeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1458
|
|
|
50
