Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Choice and other frosh
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 17
| visibility 1,378

Choice and other frosh


Sep 2, 2014, 2:13 PM

Before we jump to conclusions, let's take a minute. Hardly Not a one of us has seen more than a ten second clip of choice running at this level. Same thing with gallman. He even shied away from contact on gurleys kick return. Now from what I have seen, Davidson looks like the best RB.

Scott needs to play more. The rest of the receivers looked good. We need someone else on punt return. Also for the Adam haters he didn't get any normal targets. But since he is the best blocking WR he doesn't need to be catching the screens. Remember Syracuse?

Deshaun Watson needs to play some but I'm not ready to throw in the towel on stoudt.

Also I think the D will end up ok too.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

D will end up ok?


Sep 2, 2014, 2:16 PM

D is already more than ok. They held UGA to under 120 yards in the 1st half. In the second half, our offense gained 15 yards, and yet the defense still kept it a 3 point game until midway through the 4th when they finally were completely gassed. Not to mention UGA got the ball with awesome field position the entire game, and for the most part the defense was strong. I for one think our defense was the only reason we were even in that game as long as we were.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Because at the end of the game, everyone knew that they weren’t that much better than us or better than us at all."


What do you mean he didn't get any "normal" targets?


Sep 2, 2014, 2:20 PM

We threw to him in the endzone

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: What do you mean he didn't get any "normal" targets?


Sep 2, 2014, 2:24 PM

I dont remember that, however, I definitely dont recall any drops by him. People were criticizing him for not getting a lot on the screens. Those screens were called at an inopportune time and the receivers didnt block for him. Tell me when they threw to him in the endzone and he didnt catch it because of his own doings.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Choice and other frosh


Sep 2, 2014, 2:20 PM

I liked what I saw from the kids. They will get plenty of work this weekend. Davidson ran the ball well. Howard wasn't great, but he is going to be a big part of this team. Gallman will get his shot as will Dye and probably Choice. I was really impressed with Scott and Kitt. I'm not worried about the D. They will be fine. Crawford and Peters are very good for the rotation.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Choice and other frosh


Sep 2, 2014, 2:24 PM

I hope Howard is a big part of this team's bench

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If Gallman and Choice aren't better than the current RBs


Sep 2, 2014, 2:21 PM

then we have an issue with recruiting/coaching. Nothing I've seen from Howard or Davidson tells me that they should be irreplaceable.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Watson has IT. The it you can't coach but you know when


Sep 2, 2014, 2:23 PM

you see it. I would not play him less than 50% of the game and let the season take whichever course it takes.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Watson has IT. The it you can't coach but you know when


Sep 2, 2014, 2:25 PM

I can agree with that. I find it interesting that Morris called Stoudts interception the receivers fault. I understand that it may be so but the throw looked ill-advised anyway.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The replay makes it seem like that's the case, but


Sep 2, 2014, 2:26 PM

we don't really know if the receiver was supposed to do something else on the route based on the coverage, and maybe Cole was anticipating that.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Because at the end of the game, everyone knew that they weren’t that much better than us or better than us at all."


Re: Choice and other frosh


Sep 2, 2014, 2:28 PM

I was impressed with CJ. Kid has size / speed and to my non- coaching eyes appears to not be a jitter bug and makes pretty good cuts. He had one play near our own end zone where he was akmost tackled near the two but reversed field, turned in the jets, and made something out of nothing.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Choice and other frosh


Sep 2, 2014, 2:28 PM

Starting Offense should be as follows:

QB: Stoudt
RB: Davidson (Gallman 3rd down RB)
WR: Peake
WR: Williams
WR: Hopper/Scott
TE: Leggett
OT: Battle/K. Davis
OG: D. Beasley
C: Norton
OG: Guillermo/K. Davis
OT: K. Davis/J. Gore

2024 student level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Not a bad lineup


Sep 2, 2014, 2:31 PM

I'd like to see Choice run the ball before he's left off the offense completely though.

And take Gallman off of special teams. He was good with the ball in his hands but he looked really bad on special teams, especially on Gurley's TD.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Look What Was Done ----


Sep 2, 2014, 2:41 PM

Georgia had freshman backs and
receivers and some that were a
smidge older that only had high
school experience... and they still
played and played well. Most of
them were more productive than
Marshall. So why we couldn't play
ours. I'm sure they know at least
15 to 20 plays by heart.

Its different when being hit by a
220lb dude than tackling one coming right at you at 30mph. The mindset
is just different. The position
Humphries is in is supposed to be
Sammy's old spot. He is not suited
for that for an entire game.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

there are players that you don't need to "see" at this level


Sep 2, 2014, 2:42 PM

cj spiller's HS clips and sammy watkins HS clips told me everything i needed to know.

deshaun watson is/was the same way and the little window he had (no pun intended) he took advantage of it and showed he's a "spiller" at his position


5star skill players are ready to play from the time they step foot on campus the vast majority of the time.

and the choice/gallman thing........sorry but howard doesn't have the talent to play that position effectively.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Humphries


Sep 2, 2014, 2:59 PM

If he is the best blocker we have out there at wr, why not let him block on those screens. It seems simple enough to me.

On at least one wr screen, Hopper was blocking for him. Didn't make sense to me.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Humphries


Sep 2, 2014, 3:08 PM

I agree that humphries should be used as a blocker. He also is a good WR just needs to be used right.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

He just can't be used like Sammy was.


Sep 2, 2014, 3:24 PM

That is what I think I was seeing Saturday night.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgringofhonor-aero.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 17
| visibility 1,378
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic