Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Argue with this if you will ? Clemson had more talent on the field
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Replies: 13
| visibility 912

Argue with this if you will ? Clemson had more talent on the field

5

Sep 15, 2025, 12:52 PM
Reply

than GT Saturday but GT won because their players wanted it more and played harder. Also, our coaches got outcoached.

flag link
military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

our coaches got outcoached

2

Sep 15, 2025, 12:57 PM
Reply

I think is the correct answer

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Argue with this if you will ? Clemson had more talent on the field

1

Sep 15, 2025, 1:03 PM
Reply

Yep

Zero fire from this team right now.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Argue with this if you will ? Clemson had more talent on the field

1

Sep 15, 2025, 2:38 PM
Reply

What are we paying our coaches to do.......MOTIVATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Argue with this if you will ? Clemson had more talent on the field


Sep 15, 2025, 1:03 PM
Reply

and two turnovers

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Argue with this if you will ? Clemson had more talent on the field


Sep 15, 2025, 2:44 PM
Reply

I think we were out-talented at RB and QB, but on paper, we were the far superior team.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Argue with this if you will ? Clemson had more talent on the field


Sep 15, 2025, 2:52 PM
Reply

And out-talented at Kicker as well

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Randall is not the problem. Need more of him!!***


Sep 15, 2025, 2:54 PM [ in reply to Re: Argue with this if you will ? Clemson had more talent on the field ]
Reply



tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Randall is not the problem. Need more of him!!***


Sep 15, 2025, 3:55 PM
Reply

But he isn't as good as Jamal Haynes.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Argue with this if you will ? Clemson had more talent on the field


Sep 15, 2025, 2:54 PM
Reply

A lesser talented team that plays as a team can beat a collection of highly talented players any day.

Clemson football is not a team.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Argue with this if you will ? Clemson had more talent on the field

1

Sep 15, 2025, 2:55 PM
Reply

As a program we've gone from doing more with less to doing less with more. Very frustrating.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Argue with this if you will ? Clemson had more talent on the field


Sep 15, 2025, 3:16 PM
Reply

They can’t dominate the line of scrimmage, on either side of the ball, players are out of position on a lot of plays, and I don’t see any enthusiasm, unless you count Cade running for his life in the backfield.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Argue with this if you will ? Clemson had more talent on the field


Sep 15, 2025, 3:18 PM
Reply

Their coach REALLY wanted this one. He was no nonsense in his interviews leading up to the game. As he said, "we ain't no underdog anymore" and they played like it.

I remember someone else who also used to have that kind of fire...

2025 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Argue with this if you will ? Clemson had more talent on the field


Sep 15, 2025, 3:21 PM
Reply

Have to agree. The problem is that they know they are better , so they don’t try as hard as the tech players. Seem to be on cruise control when they should be pedal to the metal.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 13
| visibility 912
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic