Replies: 21
| visibility 1
|
Recruit [80]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 56
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23115]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19818
Joined: 1/15/11
|
Their staff were all good recruiters at their previous
Apr 7, 2016, 5:16 PM
|
|
schools. So was Brad Scott, Holtz was Nationwide at ND, Slurrier recruited gangbusters at Florida. The new USuC staff is already down to competing with Coastal Carolina for recruits now that they are at USuC. LOL
Brad Scott and 2 Legends in Holtz and Slurrier have proven over the last 20 years,it's the crap school, not the recruiters.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7719]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: USuC has a better recruiting staff than Clemson
Apr 7, 2016, 5:18 PM
|
|
In their defense their staff might be terrific but you can only sell a box of #### so well.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6321]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5009
Joined: 12/19/06
|
In other words, you can't make Chicken Salad out of...
Apr 7, 2016, 9:00 PM
|
|
Chicken $hit!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6329]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5113
Joined: 7/19/13
|
Well, it is 247
Apr 7, 2016, 5:28 PM
|
|
So if you are talking about who recruits their athletes the best, then maybe usuck does since 247 is the gamecocks of recruiting.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8244]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7565
Joined: 1/1/11
|
ROFLMFAO***
Apr 7, 2016, 5:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [25428]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14704
Joined: 11/3/11
|
My good friends have already hit the nail on the head:
Apr 7, 2016, 6:00 PM
|
|
it's not who's recruiting; it's for whom they are recruiting.
Paraphrasing: all the chicken's bosses and all the chicken's men will have a helluva time trying to put the coop back together again.
Message was edited by: hartins®
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [53178]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 23117
Joined: 10/10/11
|
Why would any top recruit want to play for Muschamp
Apr 7, 2016, 6:36 PM
|
|
if they saw his on-the-field coaching? Most players are well informed and have media savvy these days. It will take more than good recruiters to overcome his antics and poor coaching.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [57727]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39803
Joined: 11/12/04
|
there may be bags of $EC money at play, or they grew up
Apr 7, 2016, 7:02 PM
|
|
#### lovers with a #### loving family.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [53178]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 23117
Joined: 10/10/11
|
Valid points, however, the best recruit
Apr 7, 2016, 7:08 PM
|
|
will see NFL money as the ultimate goal, and look for the schools that give them the best chance to make a big impression.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2137]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1843
Joined: 1/24/14
|
Muschump took a bunch of 4 and 5 stars at Auburn and......
Apr 7, 2016, 7:10 PM
|
|
.....turned them into one of the worst defenses in the country. Thats what happens when you have an over inflated view of your university, you have to scramble and just find a coach because no serious head coach would even consider coming there. Tanner had 3 months and about a 2 month head start on other universities yet Muschump admitted that Tanner didn't even contact him until the Wednesday before he was hired, which was about 2 days. I guess they were just secretly evaluating him without him knowing. Thats how most schools do it, right? I mean you wouldn't gage a candidate's interest before evaluating would you? I will quit now but that still makes me laugh and if I was a Gamecock I would shoot myself but if I missed I would be embarrassed over this hiring process....
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5468]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2298
Joined: 11/19/12
|
Re: Muschump took a bunch of 4 and 5 stars at Auburn and......***
Apr 7, 2016, 8:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5468]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2298
Joined: 11/19/12
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2311]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 970
Joined: 11/30/98
|
BOOM !***
Apr 7, 2016, 7:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: USuC has a better recruiting staff than Clemson
Apr 7, 2016, 7:19 PM
|
|
It's absolute horse crap. Someone want to tell me how the coots have TWO 4-star commits, FOUR 3-star recruits, and 2 NR's and the class is ranked 20th?????????? Must be that other schools simply don't have 8 commits right now. Who knows.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: USuC has a better recruiting staff than Clemson
Apr 7, 2016, 7:20 PM
|
|
I'm sorry. ONE four star???? Rivals has them at 20. Ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: USuC has a better recruiting staff than Clemson
Apr 7, 2016, 7:21 PM
|
|
Ok, now they have lost a 4-star and its back to 34. Weird.
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [80]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 56
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: USuC has a better recruiting staff than Clemson
Apr 7, 2016, 7:30 PM
|
|
I wouldn't even put them in the top 5 of their conference, not to mention the country.
More coot propogana. What ever helps them sleep...
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [114]
TigerPulse: 21%
Posts: 220
Joined: 2/7/16
|
Always wanted say this, and for once...
Apr 7, 2016, 7:37 PM
|
|
I smell a coot!!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6978]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9227
Joined: 7/11/03
|
Based on what???***
Apr 7, 2016, 7:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23115]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19818
Joined: 1/15/11
|
Like every other Coot Coach in history,
Apr 7, 2016, 8:02 PM
|
|
it's based on what they done at their previous schools ,before coming to USuC. Coat tail riders at work .
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5468]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2298
Joined: 11/19/12
|
Re:Dabo competes against schools with low academic
Apr 7, 2016, 8:46 PM
|
|
standards and still does better on the recruiting trail.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 21
| visibility 1
|
|
|