Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
TNET: National analysts predict if Clemson can avoid upset at Pitt
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next
Replies: 9
| visibility 1569

TNET: National analysts predict if Clemson can avoid upset at Pitt

1
Nov 15, 2024, 10:59 AM
Reply

 
National analysts predict if Clemson can avoid upset at Pitt

Read Update »
flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Enjoy TigerNet? Upgrade and get your ® today, thanks!


1 of 19

4
Nov 15, 2024, 11:37 AM
Reply

TLDR: one of nineteen analysts in the article think Pitt even has a chance to win, & several explicitly call for Clemson to win by double-digits & cover the spread (me too).

Go Tigers!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 1 of 19


Nov 15, 2024, 1:37 PM
Reply

Hope they are correct.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 1 of 19


Nov 15, 2024, 3:13 PM
Reply

Gonna depend on which Tiger Team shows up in Pa. CK better live up to his "I can make any throw I want" comment!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Dennis Dodd always picks against Clemson lol

2
Nov 15, 2024, 3:51 PM
Reply

His writing is very anti Clemson as well. Did one of you send him a mean tweet or something? He seems jaded.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: National analysts predict if Clemson can avoid upset at Pitt

1
Nov 15, 2024, 5:27 PM
Reply

They know it. No way to sugarcoat it. We win by 35-40 points. Pitts defense numbers look good because their offense gives the other teams short fields or pick 6s.

Pitts passing D is 127th. They're not a good team.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Sad statement here

1

Nov 15, 2024, 6:38 PM
Reply

“below-average defense by Clemson standards (53rd in yards allowed per play).”

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Sad statement here

1
Nov 15, 2024, 7:09 PM
Reply

Our defense needs to improve, but that ranking is largely due to a lack of depth and our 2nd and 3rd string getting worn out in games we had won before the end of the 1st quarter.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Also, coach say Tigers got their swagger back in VT game


Nov 15, 2024, 7:16 PM
Reply

He better be right or his job may be in jeopardy. Dabo told him off several times at Louisville game.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Sad statement here


Nov 15, 2024, 11:14 PM [ in reply to Re: Sad statement here ]
Reply

Wasn’t the backups that got tricked by Louisville. This defense is way off of our standard. Last week was a step in the right direction. They’ve got 3 games to change that narrative.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 9
| visibility 1569
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Sitting in GSP, headed to Pittsburgh!!

by TigerTwice®

Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next