Updated ACC Standings.....

tiger B

Orange Blooded [2922]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 4060

Joined: 11/30/98

Wasn't really sure, so I guessed, but I looked it up today..

Feb 23, 2009, 8:11 AM [ in reply to accuracy??? ]

and here's what it says on the ACC website. Don't know where this leaves us....

ACC Basketball Tournament Seeding Procedures

Policy used to determine seeds for the men's basketball tournament.

Printer-Friendly Format

E-mail this article

Feb. 26, 2007

When two teams are tied in the standings, regular season head-to-head results are used as the tiebreaker.

If the tied teams played each other twice in the regular season and split their games, then each team's record vs. the team occupying the highest position in the final regular season standings (or in case of a tie for first place, the next highest position in the regular season standings) and then continuing down through the standings until one team gains an advantage.
a. When arriving at another pair of tied teams while comparing records, use each team's record against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to their own tie-breaking procedures), rather than the performance against the individual tied teams.
b. When comparing records against a single team or a group of teams, the higher winning percentage shall prevail, even if the number of games played against a team or group is unequal. (i.e., 2-0 is better than 3-1; 1-0 is the same as 2-0; 2-0 is the same as 4-0; 2-1 is the same as 4-2; 1-0 is better than 1-1; 0-1 is the same as 0-2; 0-2 is the same as 0-4). If the winning percentage of the tied teams is equal against a team, or a group of tied teams, continue down through the standings until one team gains an advantage.

If three or more teams are tied in the standings, the following procedures will be used:
a. The combined record of conference games between the tied teams involved will be compiled. Ties will be broken, and seedings assigned, based on the winning percentage of the combined conference records. The higher winning percentage shall prevail, even if the number of games played against the team or group is unequal (i.e., 2-0 is better than 3-1; 1-0 is the same as 2-0; 2-0 is the same as 4-0; 2-1 is the same as 4-2; 1-0 is better than 1-1; 0-1 is the same as 0-2; 0-2 is the same as 0-4).
b. If procedure (a) fails to break the tie, then each tied team's record shall be compared to the team occupying the highest position in the final regular-season standings, continuing down through the standings until one team gains an advantage by a higher winning percentage.
c. If the tie is broken by (a) or (b) regarding one of more teams, but three or more teams remain tied, then procedures (a) and (b) will be reapplied among those tied teams only.
d. If two teams remain tied, procedures (1) and (2) will be followed.

If there is more than one tie in the standings, and when utilizing the tie-breaking procedures there are a pair of teams tied, a team's record against the combined tied teams (prior to their own tie-breaking procedures) is used, rather than performance against the individual tied teams.

If procedures (2) and/or (3) fail to establish an advantage, a coin flip to break the tie will be conducted by the commissioner after the final regular season game before the Conference Championship.

If a coin flip or draw (for a three or more team tie) is required, the procedure takes place immediately following the conclusion of the last regular season game prior to the Conference Championship. The procedure is administered by the commissioner or a designated assistant. This session is open to the media and to athletics department representatives from the tied teams.

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

Re: Updated ACC Standings.....

keep doing this every time you are on Tnet and I will give

Looks like I missed a technicality.....

####. we could easily be 10-2***

I've said same thing, but I think rest of teams can say

Tell 'em not to think they can just show up and win.

accuracy???

semantics. currently 3-way tie for second***

I guess us VA tigers understand it.....***

Wasn't really sure, so I guessed, but I looked it up today..

Actually, FSU, CU & DUKE are in 3 way tie, so it goes to

Re: Actually, FSU, CU & DUKE are in 3 way tie, so it goes to

Tied for 2nd is right, but overall record doesn't count

actually, YEP. after reading it again, Duke, CU FSU***

Actually... Duke, FSU, Clemson ... I think

d@mn. right. went down to BC instead of back 2 head to head***

Good news is that none of that will matter

Yeah..thats why right now you just say tied for 2nd

That's right *******

FYI - on a Clemson board, Clemson wins ALL tiebreakers

TigerBoard POTD