Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Why wasn't that a charge on Battle?
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 4
| visibility 1

Why wasn't that a charge on Battle?


Mar 9, 2019, 2:02 PM

Nm

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Agreed. He came in completely out of control.***

1

Mar 9, 2019, 2:09 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why wasn't that a charge on Battle?


Mar 9, 2019, 2:11 PM

Same thought!

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why wasn't that a charge on Battle?


Mar 9, 2019, 2:15 PM

On the slow motion replay, Amir had position and was set. Textbook charge in my opinion.
Also, the slow motion replay showed that Marquise never touched Boeheim on the three point shot on which he made the 4pt. play. Situational referee engineering.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Was Amir set up inside the "no charge arc"?


Mar 9, 2019, 2:31 PM

Maybe so, but that's still one of the dumbest ideas they ever came up with. A charge is a charge!!

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 4
| visibility 1
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...129 days!!!

by O.J.

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic