Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
We should have bunted runners over...
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 4
| visibility 1

We should have bunted runners over...


Jun 4, 2017, 7:16 PM

0 outs runners 1st and 2nd.

I don't care if lead off is up or not. We are struggling to hit and score runs.

Have to go small ball right there.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: We should have bunted runners over...


Jun 4, 2017, 7:21 PM

I think Greene should bunt every time and just try to beat out the throw

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: We should have bunted runners over...


Jun 4, 2017, 7:22 PM

If Davidson doesn't swing at ball 4 the bases are loaded with no outs.
Then Pinder swings at the first pitch and grounds out

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: We should have bunted runners over...


Jun 4, 2017, 7:29 PM

True. It would have changed the entire complexion of the game. Second and third with Rohlman and Beer up. They would pitch to Reed and Beer could have an at bat. There is a way to play this game and hoping someone gets a hit isn't it! Make it happen. The Tigers refuse to put pressure on the opponent

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Leggett always did it .monte hardly ever***


Jun 4, 2017, 7:51 PM



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 4
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic