Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
That is probably the best offensive unit, as a whole, that I’ve
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 14
| visibility 1

That is probably the best offensive unit, as a whole, that I’ve


Sep 12, 2020, 11:39 PM

ever seen at Clemson, and I don’t think it’s really close.

The D is nasty. We will give up some big plays. It’s how BV schemes and plays. But no one is going to beat us upfront and no one is going to run the ball. We are relentless in the front 7.

Teams will have to make play after play downfield, against pressure, to have any chance.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


WHOAH, holdup a minute...


Sep 13, 2020, 12:15 AM

They’re loaded with talent, but you’re telling me that If someone forced you bet your house on a game and you could pick any CU offensive unit you wanted, you’re taking this crew over 2016?

I’ll give you an upgrade from Gallman to Etienne ( and that’s saying something), but I’ll call QB and the line a draw, with WRs and TE being downgrades from 16.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


2018 better than 2016, IMO.***


Sep 13, 2020, 12:31 AM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Disagree, but I see your point enough that


Sep 13, 2020, 12:33 AM

I wouldn’t argue too much about it. Certainly possible.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: 2018 better than 2016, IMO.***


Sep 13, 2020, 12:43 AM [ in reply to 2018 better than 2016, IMO.*** ]

Overall no way. TE and receivers were much better.

2018 Oline was much better though.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I would... obviously you have all of 2016, and only one game


Sep 13, 2020, 12:43 AM [ in reply to WHOAH, holdup a minute... ]

with this group...

But I think, as a whole, this group is better. I love DW4 as much as anyone, but Trevor is different. I think 9 is the best RB to ever touch it at Clemson.

On the whole, I think this group is more dangerous, more versatile, and more experienced than any I’ve ever seen here.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Well shoot,


Sep 13, 2020, 12:51 AM

If I just had a little more control over space and time to make that game happen, I could have a new house.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: WHOAH, holdup a minute...


Sep 13, 2020, 11:48 AM [ in reply to WHOAH, holdup a minute... ]

I mostly agree, however TE is not a downgrade; It’s at least a draw.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

maybe if Ross were with the team


Sep 13, 2020, 12:37 AM

but there is no proven deep threat. We were spoiled with Williams and Higgins, they made 50/50 balls into 80/20.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That honestly doesn’t worry me.. I think we are better across the board


Sep 13, 2020, 12:44 AM

than years past ... especially with Galloway.

I don’t think you’d see a deep threat after one game.... especially the way WF was bailing.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: That honestly doesn’t worry me.. I think we are better across the board


Sep 13, 2020, 12:53 AM

well, if say Ladson were to step up, we would be that much better. He has no problem getting open.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

yea... he’s the one that could really be dangerous and put


Sep 13, 2020, 1:05 AM

up big numbers. He’s going to get a lot of 1 on 1’s... and he can get open. He needs to be more consistent when it hits his hands.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: yea... he’s the one that could really be dangerous and put


Sep 13, 2020, 1:39 AM

nice to see the TEs and backs involved in the passing game, brings versatility as you mentioned. ETN will have well over 2000 APY this year if he stays healthy. Ladson and/or William need to establish themselves as deep threats if we want to beat a team like ND on the road. A lot of Roger's yards would not have been there against a good defense.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Amari and Galloway looked really good.


Sep 13, 2020, 1:14 AM [ in reply to That honestly doesn’t worry me.. I think we are better across the board ]

Trevor and Etienne were awesome.
The O line was good after the first series.

Ngata and Ladson will get better.
Agou will be really good when he develops some.

Potter was very strong.

The reserves need some work.

The D will be even nastier when Kendrick returns.

Overall an A for the starters, A for play calling, B minus for the reserves.

I'll take it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: That is probably the best offensive unit, as a whole, that I’ve


Sep 13, 2020, 7:39 AM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-francismarion.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"I've played multiple sports and would bet any amount that I'm still more athletic than you at this present time...."


Replies: 14
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic