Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus Wake Forest
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 8
| visibility 1

TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus Wake Forest


Nov 18, 2019, 7:01 AM

 
Second Look: Grading Clemson versus Wake Forest

Key takeaways and game grades for the Tigers after an 11-0 start and a dominant win over Wake Forest. Full Story »


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus Wake Forest


Nov 18, 2019, 7:36 AM

I just dont understand why we cannot get a punter that can hit the long and deep punts that the rest of the teams seem to have. If I was a punter that possessed those skills, I would be beating down the doors to get on the team. GO TIGERS!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

For 34 plays


Nov 18, 2019, 8:17 AM

Per year? ;)

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus Wake Forest


Nov 18, 2019, 10:45 AM [ in reply to Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus Wake Forest ]

Amen. Seems to be an every year thing.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Wake out kicked their coverage a couple of times.***


Nov 19, 2019, 12:26 AM [ in reply to Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus Wake Forest ]

null

Message was edited by: RC Tiger®


2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Special teams got a B- ?


Nov 18, 2019, 8:27 AM

I wish grading would've been that generous when I was in college.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"IDIOT POSTER OF THE MONTH SO FAR...GWP-- You have won IPM Award for your failure to completely comprehend a clear post & then choose to attack someone who points out your ignorance. While you are not yet in the same No Class Catagory as deRoberts, ClemTiger117 & Tigerdug23, you are getting closer to the Sewer Dwellers." - coachmac


Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus Wake Forest


Nov 18, 2019, 8:54 AM

Dead-on with the grades for Offense and Defense. Anything above a D+ for Special Teams tells me someone wasn't watching the same game I was. Giving them that grade based on 1 good return when the punter can't handle a perfect snap and turns the ball over on our own 28 yard line when the game was still early and fairly close is like giving a B- to a student who gets a 90 on one test and a 30 on the next.The average is still a 60!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus Wake Forest


Nov 18, 2019, 10:45 AM

Spiers was bad in this game, no doubt. Let's not forget that B.T. was very good, hitting on his only field goal attempt, making all of his extra points and driving the ball consistently through the end zone on kick offs. Also, the coverage teams did their jobs, limited as it was.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Am I the only one A little surprised that Nikki ....


Nov 19, 2019, 1:31 AM

.... called out Spiers so strongly ?? Not saying she is wrong ... in fact I’m in agreement with her assessment - just find it a little surprising she wrote that .... -<img border=">

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If people were as good as their obituary - and products were as good as advertised - this would truly be a wonderful world !!


Replies: 8
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic