Freshman [9]
TigerPulse: 26%
Posts: 38
Joined: 11/13/18
|
Book is the better QB we were wrong.
[1]
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 7:45 AM
|
|
Book gave a gritty performance and didn't choke the second half. I have to change my stance on that.
|
|
|
 |
Rock Defender [68]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46
Joined: 10/1/13
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 7:46 AM
|
|
Better than who?
|
|
|
|
 |
Freshman [9]
TigerPulse: 26%
Posts: 38
Joined: 11/13/18
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 7:47 AM
|
|
Then BC's qb.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2616]
TigerPulse: 80%
Posts: 5340
Joined: 1/5/17
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 8:22 AM
|
|
Doug,
They both played really well against us. I wonder how they graded out.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1548]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 3690
Joined: 12/23/03
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
[1]
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 7:47 AM
|
|
I agree. He surprised me. I still think he had the performance of his life and I’m not so sure that will happen again vs us.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1139]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1925
Joined: 8/30/04
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
[1]
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 8:02 AM
|
|
i agree. I had not watched a ND game this year and just going by what i read on here , Ian was incapable of a forward pass . he played very well . congrats to ND looking forward to the rematch
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2891]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2488
Joined: 7/19/13
|
he played well
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 8:04 AM
|
|
against guys not even on our depth chart. Things will be different if we meet up again and are healthy. But yes, he played very well.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [27349]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 26233
Joined: 9/19/11
|
Yes, Book was better QB
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 8:15 AM
|
|
than their second string QB.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [15440]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 11784
Joined: 8/6/02
|
48-3 #KEEPMUSCHAMP
[1]
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 8:25 AM
|
|
u6c
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [13597]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7517
Joined: 12/2/18
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 9:29 AM
|
|
Gee why don’t you post with original username?
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [10840]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7590
Joined: 6/29/11
|
Who was he originally ? He has an impressive TigerPulse.***
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 9:32 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [13597]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7517
Joined: 12/2/18
|
Re: Who was he originally ? He has an impressive TigerPulse.***
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 10:02 AM
|
|
Mr., “I’ve donated for years but can’t remember my password...”
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [10039]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9633
Joined: 2/14/15
|
Re: Who was he originally ? He has an impressive TigerPulse.***
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 11:00 AM
|
|
Mr., “I’ve donated for years but can’t remember my password...”
I think that was another user..
Name started with a C...
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [8268]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7101
Joined: 12/9/02
|
Book’s OL dominated us
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 9:40 AM
|
|
We didn’t sack him a single time. No matter how much pressure we sent.
We needed Davis to push the pocket and flush him into the pressure. We have nobody that can push the pocket right now.
|
|
|
|
 |
1st Rounder [600]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 569
Joined: 9/22/14
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 9:41 AM
|
|
We missed Skalski in managing Book.
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [20471]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 27878
Joined: 6/22/03
|
Examples of DJ choking please?***
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 10:19 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Scout Team [163]
TigerPulse: 87%
Posts: 244
Joined: 11/7/15
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
Posted: Nov 9, 2020, 11:37 AM
|
|
IMO, it was his elusiveness that was decisive. He missed a bunch of throws, but his escapability gave his receivers, particularly his TEs, time to get open and make plays. Our pass rush was not great, but his keeping plays alive when he was flushed kept numerous drives alive.
|
|
|
|
|
|