|
Replies: 17
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [2432]
TigerPulse: 76%
Posts: 3108
Joined: 6/21/11
|
Question about Scott's catch in the end zone
Jan 16, 2016, 3:15 PM
|
|
Where the bama player knocked the ball out and the play called incomplete.
This was not discussed or tallked about at all. Why is it not a touch down? If you watch the play again, you will see Scott with position of the ball and knee down and then the DB knocked the ball away. This happened is a split second that it does appear as incomplete but slow motion shows otherwise.
So what am I missing here about rules regarding this play?
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [7723]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5929
Joined: 12/14/15
|
Re: Question about Scott's catch in the end zone
Jan 16, 2016, 3:16 PM
|
|
Unless he makes a "football move," such as turning upfield or juking or whatever, then he has to control the ball through contact with the ground. This he did not do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2432]
TigerPulse: 76%
Posts: 3108
Joined: 6/21/11
|
Re: Question about Scott's catch in the end zone
Jan 16, 2016, 3:30 PM
|
|
I guess this different than running the ball in where just the tip of the ball has to go in
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8681]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8888
Joined: 10/19/11
|
Re: Question about Scott's catch in the end zone
Jan 16, 2016, 3:34 PM
|
|
when you are running you're making a football move
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2432]
TigerPulse: 76%
Posts: 3108
Joined: 6/21/11
|
thanks makes complete sense now***
Jan 16, 2016, 3:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1047]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1594
Joined: 11/17/09
|
you have to possess the ball all the way to the ground***
Jan 16, 2016, 3:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27364]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 31821
Joined: 8/19/03
|
Re: you have to possess the ball all the way to the ground***
Jan 16, 2016, 3:22 PM
|
|
I thought that he did control the ball. Wondered why that wasn't replayed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4504]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9112
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Looked like he did.***
Jan 16, 2016, 9:32 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [598]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 584
Joined: 6/29/11
|
Re: Question about Scott's catch in the end zone
Jan 16, 2016, 3:22 PM
|
|
But it could have easily been called pass interference. He hit Scott's arm before the ball arrived.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6692]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11164
Joined: 10/14/07
|
Re: Question about Scott's catch in the end zone
Jan 16, 2016, 3:26 PM
|
|
^^this
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1845]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 2788
Joined: 12/14/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16363
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Danny Ford got suspended for a game for questioning a call
Jan 16, 2016, 3:23 PM
|
|
... where a Maryland receiver "possessed" the ball for a nano-second at the goal line before losing control and dropping it.
It was scored a TD for The Terps because they said the guy had possession as he crossed the plane of the goal line.
The rules must have changed sine then to disallow Scott's catch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1239]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 2078
Joined: 7/14/13
|
Re: Question about Scott's catch in the end zone
Jan 16, 2016, 3:36 PM
|
|
We lost. Let's move on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6280]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12979
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: Question about Scott's catch in the end zone
Jan 16, 2016, 7:07 PM
|
|
Thank you!! ????. We are focused on getting better and beating Auburn!! Go Tigers
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [632]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 749
Joined: 1/13/04
|
Re: Question about Scott's catch in the end zone
Jan 16, 2016, 11:14 PM
|
|
The ground can't cause a fumble, but it can cause an incompletion. This is a rule that needs to be looked at
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10483]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7756
Joined: 12/5/15
|
Re: Question about Scott's catch in the end zone
Jan 16, 2016, 4:02 PM
|
|
It is the rule. I don't like the rule, but it is the rule. He has to maintain possession all the way through. In my opinion, this "new catch rule" is a load of garbage that was invented by a bunch of non-athlete, bean counter, scum bag lawyer types that couldn't catch a football if you nailed it to their chest with a railroad spike.
2 hands on the ball, then 2 feet down, then butt hits ground.......any other play is over at that point....but on a catch with no moves, the play continues until the player comes up with the ball.
This specific rule has 2 major problems.
1. It is INCONSISTENT with all other rules as to when the ball is dead.
2. It is highly subjective as to when is the play over. "Must maintain possession through the catch". Great!!!!! Exactly when is that?
Garbage rule, written by lawyers. You can tell it was written by lawyers because after you read it you still don't know what it means.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [90729]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 45485
Joined: 10/18/09
|
Whatever....this miss was a GAMEBREAKER !
Jan 16, 2016, 5:20 PM
|
|
But Boy did Scott give it the ole college try! But, a good D effort too!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4973]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 5276
Joined: 6/2/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
