|
Replies: 15
| visibility 5,466
|
Hall of Famer [22929]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16887
Joined: 12/2/00
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3612]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 3789
Joined: 1/21/16
|
Re: Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble
Oct 17, 2019, 1:42 AM
|
|
I thought all turnovers were reviewable. Evidently only the ones ruled to be turnovers are reviewable; the refs are free to blow all calls that contain a potential turnover.
So Baylor should have been tagged with the loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10460]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7014
Joined: 5/14/01
|
Re: Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble
Oct 17, 2019, 7:43 AM
|
|
Although the ruling was incorrect, it wasn’t a turnover. The rule applied was similar to a false start which stops the play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3612]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 3789
Joined: 1/21/16
|
Re: Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble
Oct 17, 2019, 9:24 AM
|
|
My understanding is that the reason it was not a turnover is because the ref blew the call.
He didn't blow the whistle before the fumble; he incorrectly asserted that Fruh had committed a snap infraction before the fumble. My understanding is that video evidence, were it allowable, would have allowed the turnover to stand.
Baylor loses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10460]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7014
Joined: 5/14/01
|
Re: Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble
Oct 17, 2019, 9:49 AM
|
|
All of that is true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [855]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 649
Joined: 1/20/05
|
It seems to be like when a ref calls
Oct 17, 2019, 6:19 AM
|
|
forward progress had stopped before a fumble. The ball is dead then...and that is not reviewable.
In some ways I miss the old days of not stopping a teams momentum to review a play. Just play well and take the officials input out of the game...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13941
Joined: 7/3/01
|
The AD didn't violate any rule, imo. He didn't comment on
Oct 17, 2019, 7:54 AM
|
|
officiating: he commented on the league's rulng of an officiating matter, and even then he was merely confirming what the league had actually done. I wouldn't pay it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [856]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 783
Joined: 11/9/10
|
Exactly
Oct 17, 2019, 8:09 AM
|
|
He didn't speak poorly of the officiating he just presented facts and confirmed that the entire game would be reviewed. I don't see what the issue is here; especially not a $25,000 fine issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [67627]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115386
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble
Oct 17, 2019, 8:12 AM
|
|
Snapped it into his behind. Didnt see it happen but unreal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10460]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7014
Joined: 5/14/01
|
Re: Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble
Oct 17, 2019, 8:31 AM
|
|
I happened to be watching when it happened. The announcers expressed doubt about the ruling. Aside from that snap, Frumorgen played really well. He didn’t miss any blocks that I could see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [90693]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 45474
Joined: 10/18/09
|
Whatever, TT played Baylor tight & looked pretty good.
Oct 17, 2019, 8:37 AM
|
|
That's all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64892]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33146
Joined: 12/3/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24042]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9772
Joined: 10/7/15
|
Re: Jake Fruhmorgen... name sounds familiar, but not sure.
Oct 17, 2019, 8:34 AM
|
|
Maybe now I’ll know him, since he will be the guy who screwed up and snapped a ball into somebody’s backside.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [67627]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115386
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Jake Fruhmorgen... dont blink
Oct 17, 2019, 8:41 AM
|
|
or you'll miss another transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
He should appeal the fine
Oct 17, 2019, 10:02 AM
|
|
The AD didn't say anything inappropriate IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [197]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 199
Joined: 1/14/09
|
Re: Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble
Oct 17, 2019, 8:43 PM
|
|
Didn’t know Baylor had a girls school.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 5,466
|
|
|
50
