|
Replies: 49
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [3769]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5333
Joined: 11/9/08
|
Coots claim they are back after gaining 325 yds of offense Saturday
Oct 31, 2016, 8:56 PM
|
|
After hearing all the hoopla about Bentley I decided to check out their stats figuring they must have put up about 450 yds and maybe he threw for about 300. Wrong
Bentley threw for 160 yds yes 1-6-0 and total offense was 325. But hey they are back.
Meanwhile the upstate team put up 511 yds and our QB threw for a measly 378 yds against a top 15 team on the road. But coots are back right? Their fans blow my mind.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [36409]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21512
Joined: 10/27/03
|
In Fairness They Might Could Beat El Cid Now***
Oct 31, 2016, 8:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3769]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5333
Joined: 11/9/08
|
Re: In Fairness They Might Could Beat El Cid Now***
Oct 31, 2016, 8:59 PM
|
|
Possibly. They do after all have a Tom Brady/Peyton Manning hybrid now according to their fans
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1431]
TigerPulse: 56%
Posts: 2153
Joined: 1/29/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6575]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5488
Joined: 9/22/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5572]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4060
Joined: 10/3/03
|
They're mentally challenged, sad but true.***
Oct 31, 2016, 9:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [25962]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 20635
Joined: 7/31/07
|
Re: They're mentally challenged, sad but true.***
Oct 31, 2016, 9:28 PM
|
|
Well, they still have 2 cupcakes left on their schedule. By then, they will think they are conference champions. They have beat no one of significance. Tennessee, as we are finding out, is in complete disarray and have been for awhile now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [53773]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43560
Joined: 11/17/03
|
ANd that was with UT tossing two,three int's to give them
Oct 31, 2016, 9:27 PM
|
|
extra possessions.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26330]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15326
Joined: 1/12/00
|
App State was a missed kick away from beating Tenn. SEC East
Oct 31, 2016, 9:29 PM
|
|
deserves Kentucky winning that side. Not good football. Probably the worst division in power 5 football.
They're back alright, back to being mediocre. Which is a high note for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Coots claim they are back after gaining 325 yds of offense Saturday
Oct 31, 2016, 9:37 PM
|
|
I would imagine there would be different standards for a group of true freshman and a bunch of guys about to be in the NFL next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60228]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42556
Joined: 11/30/98
|
youngest team in college football per Phil Steele is.....
Oct 31, 2016, 9:51 PM
|
|
Clemson (#128).
Chickens come in at 107.
---------------------------------
For more than 8 years I have published an “Experience Chart” in my National College Football Preview. The old version of this chart just took into account the overall experience from the 2 deep for each squad. Several years ago I revised the Experience Chart and created a New and Improved version. The updated chart uses 20% of the experience grade from the old chart, 20% from the % of lettermen returning, 20% from the percent of tackles returning, 20% from the percent of yards returning and 20% from the career starts of the offensive line.
The most experienced teams when using the old chart were usually the service academies, which play a lot of seniors and juniors. Using the old method (which is listed below) the top 5 most experienced teams in terms of upperclassmen in the two deep are: 1. Air Force 2. New Mexico 3. Navy 4. Utah 5. BYU.
The least experienced teams using this method are: 128. Clemson 127. Oklahoma 126. ULM.
https://www.philsteele.com/blogs/2016/JUNE16/DBJune24.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64589]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88994
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Facts will only confuse this Coot***
Oct 31, 2016, 10:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: youngest team in college football per Phil Steele is.....
Oct 31, 2016, 10:27 PM
[ in reply to youngest team in college football per Phil Steele is..... ] |
|
That's cool and all but I'm not sure how accurate that really is when you're going to lose Deshaun Watson, Mike Williams, Wayne Gallman, Artavis Scott, Jordan Leggett and Jay Guillermo.
That's 55% of your offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5912]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8567
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: youngest team in college football per Phil Steele is.....
Oct 31, 2016, 10:39 PM
|
|
And I'm not sure how you are still here.
That's two questions that will never be completely settled till those involved finally leave.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1453]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2045
Joined: 9/10/16
|
Re: youngest team in college football per Phil Steele is.....
Oct 31, 2016, 10:43 PM
|
|
We will just reload next year! We are built for this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1453]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2045
Joined: 9/10/16
|
Re: youngest team in college football per Phil Steele is.....
Oct 31, 2016, 10:45 PM
|
|
We have elite talent coming down the recruiting pipeline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64589]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88994
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [53773]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43560
Joined: 11/17/03
|
Do you remember when we lost Beasley and Crawford and
Nov 1, 2016, 12:26 AM
[ in reply to Re: youngest team in college football per Phil Steele is..... ] |
|
Stephone Anthony,and you Coots said, your defense will be terrible next year, and we went to the National Championship, and then you Coots said," Y'all just lost Lawson and Dodd and McKensie ALexander and Goodson and Kearse and TJ, you will have no pass rush and the defense will be terrible" and let me go to NCAASTATS.ORG and check.....yep,we are #2 in team sacks, #3 in Tackles for loss and 14th overall after playing numbers 1,10,28,29,73,85,and 122 ( not counting SC. State)
Coots on the other hand are 48th in total defense after playing numbers 12,16,47,71,92,115, and 124 in offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Do you remember when we lost Beasley and Crawford and
Nov 1, 2016, 8:27 AM
|
|
The QB position isn't like the defensive positions you mention.
Without DW you would have lost several games the past two years. He made those defensive transitions much easier.
You wouldn't have beaten Louisville or FSU without him. He's a very special talent that doesn't come around often.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 199
Joined: 11/3/02
|
Re: Do you remember when we lost Beasley and Crawford and
Nov 1, 2016, 9:02 AM
|
|
DW made the defensive transitions easier? What position does he play on defense? That is an asinine comment at best, Watson has nothing to do with defense.
You could argue that this year he has put the defense in some tougher situations with some turnovers that he didn't make last year.
We wouldn't of beat Louisville or FSU without him? I love playing the "what if" game. Take away any teams best player and you could say the same thing. Do you think Louisville beats Clemson without Lamar? Would FSU have the same record without Dalvin Cook?
Point is, you cluckers think there is going to be this huge drop off on offense next year, which couldn't be further from the truth. Although we lose Watson and some others, we are loaded with talent at the skill positions and return 4 on the o line. Keep telling yourself we won't be good next year, I love the doubters
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Do you remember when we lost Beasley and Crawford and
Nov 1, 2016, 10:40 AM
|
|
Do you realize your what if argument actually supports my argument ITT?
I'm not the one arguing losing DW is no big deal next year...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4947]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6981
Joined: 10/12/06
|
Re: Do you remember when we lost Beasley and Crawford and
Nov 1, 2016, 10:45 AM
|
|
Is it a big deal? Yes, but I feel a lot more confident with our depth chart and defense than yours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64589]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88994
Joined: 3/27/01
|
What color is the sky in your world?
Nov 1, 2016, 10:42 AM
[ in reply to Re: Do you remember when we lost Beasley and Crawford and ] |
|
The point is, you deluded goobers are desperately trying to convince yourselves that there is going to be some tremendous drop-off with the Clemson offense next year, and that's just not going to be the case, but by all means, please keep telling yourself that. I thoroughly enjoy watching you clowns set yourselves up for even more disappointment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: What color is the sky in your world?
Nov 1, 2016, 10:45 AM
|
|
There doesn't need to be a tremendous drop off for you to be a 2-3 loss team next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4947]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6981
Joined: 10/12/06
|
Re: What color is the sky in your world?
Nov 1, 2016, 10:47 AM
|
|
This is correct because UL and FSU are right behind us right now, but we will still be as talent as either of those teams. On the other hand the rest of our schedule is still behind us and that will not change next season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18069]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15511
Joined: 7/7/03
|
There doesn't need to be a tremendous drop off for
Nov 1, 2016, 10:48 AM
[ in reply to Re: What color is the sky in your world? ] |
|
you to be an 8 loss team next year.
You are a goober. Stop denying there is a ridiculous talent gap between SC and Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: There doesn't need to be a tremendous drop off for
Nov 1, 2016, 10:52 AM
|
|
Who is denying the gap in talent?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64589]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88994
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16058]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 24596
Joined: 5/14/02
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 199
Joined: 11/3/02
|
Re: What color is the sky in your world?
Nov 1, 2016, 4:05 PM
[ in reply to Re: What color is the sky in your world? ] |
|
There would need to be a large drop off for us to lose 2 or 3 next year. You are making my point for me. Every win doesn't hinge on the play of Watson. If it did, the State game might of been a loss. I could argue the defense is why we won that game, as well as Louisville. We play great team football, one guy doesn't define what Dabo has built as a program.
But like I said, whatever helps you sleep better at night, sweetheart. Clemson offense will be just fine next year, bank on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2683]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2751
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Schuessler could have won all these games as well
Nov 1, 2016, 1:51 PM
[ in reply to Re: Do you remember when we lost Beasley and Crawford and ] |
|
So could Kelly Bryant, Tucker Israel, or Zerrick Cooper. You certainly can't prove that they couldn't.
I believe the Clemson Tigers *TEAM* has just figured out how to win, no matter what.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [53773]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43560
Joined: 11/17/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9300]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6392
Joined: 11/17/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64589]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88994
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Facts that don't support their deluded agenda....
Nov 1, 2016, 11:15 AM
|
|
are ignored or dismissed and anti-Capon rhetoric.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [456]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 926
Joined: 11/24/09
|
Re: Coots claim they are back after gaining 325 yds of offense Saturday
Oct 31, 2016, 9:53 PM
[ in reply to Re: Coots claim they are back after gaining 325 yds of offense Saturday ] |
|
Deshaun had 435 yards and 6 touchdowns in his first start ever as a freshman if you want to use youth as an excuse for why his numbers are so low even though he's the supposed savior
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [53773]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43560
Joined: 11/17/03
|
We have not 1 but 2, Five * defensive players on ice this
Oct 31, 2016, 11:55 PM
|
|
year. Think about that coots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23112]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19812
Joined: 1/15/11
|
Also a 4 star DT that will be a beast.
Nov 1, 2016, 3:00 PM
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23112]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19812
Joined: 1/15/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1453]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2045
Joined: 9/10/16
|
Re: Coots claim they are back after gaining 325 yds of offense Saturday
Oct 31, 2016, 9:58 PM
|
|
Let them enjoy their little moment. It will be brief. Haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5912]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8567
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Congratulations to Them
Oct 31, 2016, 10:50 PM
|
|
They've found a serviceable college QB after 2.5 years of wandering in the wilderness of annointing Mitch, Orth, Nunez and McIlwain as saviors and better than DW4.
They've only ruined 4 QNs.
My reasonable usc friends are now questioning a coaching staff that benched Bentley for one-half of the season in favor of Orth and McIlwain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64589]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88994
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Bentley hasn't faced a defense that's worth a **** yet...
Oct 31, 2016, 11:50 PM
|
|
and he's still only putting-up mediocre numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6474]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10128
Joined: 11/2/03
|
Re: Coots claim they are back after gaining 325 yds of offense Saturday
Oct 31, 2016, 10:56 PM
|
|
Well, even a blind horse gets an acorn every now and again. I still think the entire UT team must have had the flu, the small pox, the plague, or something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4036]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5409
Joined: 1/3/14
|
Re: Coots claim they are back after gaining 325 yds of offense Saturday
Oct 31, 2016, 10:58 PM
|
|
325 yards against the 69th best defense in College Football. At home. They really are back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28802]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58393
Joined: 11/14/03
|
They were ranked lower than that before playing SC***
Oct 31, 2016, 11:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [53773]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43560
Joined: 11/17/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28802]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58393
Joined: 11/14/03
|
Plus, FSU's defense is still ranked higher than UTjr's even after Saturday's games***
Oct 31, 2016, 11:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4023]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3506
Joined: 1/9/03
|
"Back like cooked crack" to quote ex coot Corey Boyd***
Nov 1, 2016, 12:28 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10345]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12803
Joined: 11/22/03
|
Re: Coots claim they are back after gaining 325 yds of offense Saturday
Nov 1, 2016, 8:31 AM
|
|
They have been back since Spurrier left.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7026]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15686
Joined: 10/10/02
|
But they are back.
Nov 1, 2016, 9:58 AM
|
|
The last two years they are back to exactly what they are as a program. 3-7 wins a year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8244]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7565
Joined: 1/1/11
|
Yes they are Back on the Bottom!***
Nov 1, 2016, 2:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 49
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
