Replies: 30
| visibility 2,501
|
Hall of Famer [23083]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16959
Joined: 12/2/00
|
Pitt declined the NIT bid
2
Mar 17, 2024, 8:00 PM
|
|
Surprised that we're a #6 seed while UVA is #10 play-in
|
|
|
|
Legend [17856]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14265
Joined: 10/24/10
|
Respect that***
3
Mar 17, 2024, 8:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13919]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9097
Joined: 8/30/18
|
Re: Respect that***
2
Mar 17, 2024, 8:04 PM
|
|
I guess it's good that someone else who really wants to be there can get a slot but I don't think it is a good look for the program. Comes across like a protest vote because you didn't get into the Big Dance so you just take your ball and go home.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38452]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33206
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: Respect that***
1
Mar 17, 2024, 8:47 PM
|
|
It's the economy.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [44183]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 33072
Joined: 2/22/03
|
Our resume is a lot better than theirs.***
2
Mar 17, 2024, 8:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13919]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9097
Joined: 8/30/18
|
Re: Our resume is a lot better than theirs.***
2
Mar 17, 2024, 8:05 PM
|
|
What does our resume being better have to do with them turning down the NIT?
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [44183]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 33072
Joined: 2/22/03
|
I was referring to his comment about UVA being a 10 seed.
2
Mar 17, 2024, 8:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [44183]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 33072
Joined: 2/22/03
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13919]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9097
Joined: 8/30/18
|
Re: I was referring to his comment about UVA being a 10 seed.***
2
Mar 17, 2024, 8:11 PM
|
|
Ah, got it. Sorry...
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58076]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39893
Joined: 11/12/04
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17006]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10856
Joined: 1/25/07
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9015]
TigerPulse: 69%
Posts: 9497
Joined: 1/18/17
|
Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid
3
4
Mar 17, 2024, 8:02 PM
|
|
Pitt and Uva both deserved to be ahead of Clemson.
The system is broken.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2922]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4061
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Niceyour feathers are showing.
Mar 17, 2024, 8:04 PM
|
|
Clemson clearly deserved a bid based on its full season. Several victories over tournament teams.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14427]
TigerPulse: 79%
Posts: 22969
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid
1
Mar 17, 2024, 8:05 PM
[ in reply to Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid ] |
|
you mean the pitt team we beat handily twice. that pitt team. how are you allowed to spew your garbage here.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17006]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10856
Joined: 1/25/07
|
Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid
Mar 17, 2024, 10:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13919]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9097
Joined: 8/30/18
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10984]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4686
Joined: 10/25/11
|
Clemson may lose the opener again, but they 100% deserve to be in.
2
Mar 17, 2024, 8:13 PM
[ in reply to Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid ] |
|
Beat USC, TCU, ALA, UNC, PITTx2.
I know they had some regrettable losses in there too. But come on.
Message was edited by: NorthwestPurple®
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9310]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2836
Joined: 2/23/23
|
We didnt play southern cal this year***
8
8
Mar 17, 2024, 8:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1167]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 634
Joined: 7/8/12
|
Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid
Mar 17, 2024, 8:17 PM
[ in reply to Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid ] |
|
The troll’s colors and feathers finally show.
About time.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3033]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 735
Joined: 9/18/17
|
Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid
Mar 17, 2024, 8:40 PM
[ in reply to Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid ] |
|
Coot troll.
Clemson80tiger: Help me out here, please.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38452]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33206
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid
1
Mar 17, 2024, 8:48 PM
[ in reply to Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid ] |
|
No they didn't. Clemson was 2-0 against Pitt , and Clemson clearly has the better resume.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14696]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8069
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid
6
6
Mar 17, 2024, 8:02 PM
|
|
I don't blame them at all. We should have done the same last year.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [31593]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9160
Joined: 8/31/15
|
Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid
4
Mar 17, 2024, 8:07 PM
|
|
Well we kind of did seeing we did not show up.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9015]
TigerPulse: 69%
Posts: 9497
Joined: 1/18/17
|
Kinda like we didnt show up to the ACC tournament this year.
Mar 17, 2024, 8:20 PM
|
|
Wait. That’s two tournaments in a row. Hmmm…
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3033]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 735
Joined: 9/18/17
|
Re: Kinda like we didnt show up to the ACC tournament this year.
Mar 17, 2024, 9:19 PM
|
|
Coot troll.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11653]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 13709
Joined: 10/27/04
|
Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid
1
Mar 17, 2024, 8:03 PM
|
|
They were the Clemson this season. That is what Clemson should have done laat season..but chose uninspired ball in loss to Morehead State.
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [81782]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 23781
Joined: 8/21/06
|
Brownell , once rejected a cbi bid.***
3
Mar 17, 2024, 8:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30944]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22935
Joined: 11/1/03
|
there's a $27,500 entry fee to get into the CBI
Mar 17, 2024, 8:08 PM
|
|
IPTAY donors would've rioted.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [31593]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9160
Joined: 8/31/15
|
Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid
1
Mar 17, 2024, 8:09 PM
|
|
Why not decline it? That tournament means absolutely nothing. Kind of embarrassing to get that invite imo.
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [372]
TigerPulse: 72%
Posts: 407
Joined: 4/10/10
|
Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid
Mar 17, 2024, 8:46 PM
|
|
I think Virginia would have also because they would probably get beat by a lower seed. Oakland and Morehead St are in the the Big Dance.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11130]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12836
Joined: 9/28/10
|
Re: Pitt declined the NIT bid
Mar 17, 2024, 8:50 PM
|
|
Indiana and St. Johns declined too. Didn't the Tar Heels decline the NIT last year?
|
|
|
|
Replies: 30
| visibility 2,501
|
|
|