Replies: 23
| visibility 14
|
CU Guru [1043]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1423
Joined: 9/7/04
|
If healthy, Is our O unstoppable next season?
Dec 15, 2014, 2:07 PM
|
|
DW, Gallman, Dye, Choice, Brooks, Williams, Scott, Cain, Mccloud, Thompson, Leggett, Seck, Richard.....HOLY COW!
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [112786]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 74187
Joined: 9/10/03
|
Re: If healthy, Is our O unstoppable next season?
Dec 15, 2014, 2:11 PM
|
|
Haven't heard much about Richard, anyjuan know how he has looked in practice?
|
|
|
|
|
Member [28]
TigerPulse: 87%
Posts: 96
Joined: 9/23/14
|
Re: If healthy, Is our O unstoppable next season?
Dec 15, 2014, 2:14 PM
|
|
The O should be pretty good just have to see how the O line stands up. The play calling would be good to get a gauge on in the bowl game and make sure were not going to be running about 50 screen passes a game.
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [862]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 2434
Joined: 11/25/05
|
Re: If healthy, Is our O unstoppable next season?
Dec 15, 2014, 2:23 PM
|
|
Screen pass is an extension of the run game and, with a completion, let's us keep the fast-tempo going. We will stop using as many when the offensive line proves they can be dominant. Until then, keep them coming!
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2041
Joined: 1/13/14
|
Re: If healthy, Is our O unstoppable next season?
Dec 15, 2014, 3:35 PM
[ in reply to Re: If healthy, Is our O unstoppable next season? ] |
|
Morris was singing his praises before he left for SMU. Think he is a Dwayne Allen type but will be productive earlier in his career because he is ahead of where Allen was mentally and maturity wise.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3899]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 4999
Joined: 11/29/04
|
Re: If healthy, Is our O unstoppable next season?
Dec 15, 2014, 5:36 PM
|
|
Very stoppable unless there is MAJOR IMPROVEMENT on the OLine. That group was a Big Disappointment this year!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [108392]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 64974
Joined: 2/25/06
|
need a nasty hb/te; seckinger has heart, leggett needs to
Dec 15, 2014, 2:14 PM
|
|
step up too. they're both being asked to do something they didn't do in hs, which is get dirty inside.
maybe richard or someone else steps up in that hammer role?
dw looked fantastic at times this year. it'd be nice if he isn't relied on in the run game as much as it appeared morris/staff were going to ride him in the gt game.
great weapons at his disposal, let's hope the line comes together as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2762]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4487
Joined: 9/2/13
|
As sad as it was to see Kitt xfer, it is just a sign that
Dec 15, 2014, 2:15 PM
|
|
depth is now inching up in priority. I don't see our D dropping too much either.
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [65]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 404
Joined: 10/6/12
|
Re: As sad as it was to see Kitt xfer, it is just a sign that
Dec 15, 2014, 2:54 PM
|
|
DW should be used to hand off and pass would not let him run near as much he's to good to put him out there like that plus we have a ton of weapons. DW is another Andrew Luck a pocket passer that can run and not vice versa.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14500
Joined: 1/2/11
|
Best offense in nation if DW stays healthy***
Dec 15, 2014, 2:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13090]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22408
Joined: 4/24/04
|
Depends on whether or not we can block for them.***
Dec 15, 2014, 2:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9112]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 13833
Joined: 7/1/02
|
Agree - it really all starts there - a weak O-line will.....
Dec 15, 2014, 3:11 PM
|
|
mean a weak offense.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4098]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 10336
Joined: 7/1/97
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: If healthy, Is our O unstoppable next season?
Dec 15, 2014, 2:58 PM
|
|
Be interested in seeing Crowder's development and whether Battle can make the jump from starting material to NFL material. Battle has all the goods but can still be inconsistent. I'm hoping he has a senior year like B. Thomas did.
Webster is one I expect to show out.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17667]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14488
Joined: 12/14/98
|
Some proven, some potential talent - need to see consistent
Dec 15, 2014, 3:14 PM
|
|
execution and clutch performance in big games.
I really like what the Tigers have next year on offense but not quite ready to put them in the final four.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5915]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8570
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: If healthy, Is our O unstoppable next season?***
Dec 15, 2014, 3:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5915]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8570
Joined: 11/30/98
|
No!
Dec 15, 2014, 3:18 PM
|
|
Every stoppable offense is dependent on a dominant offensive line.
We aren't there yet.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2481]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 9264
Joined: 8/16/99
|
not so fast my friend
Dec 15, 2014, 3:41 PM
|
|
HUGE CONCERNS on the OL
IMO
#21
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7040]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 12767
Joined: 11/21/99
|
Re: If healthy, Is our O unstoppable next season?
Dec 15, 2014, 5:44 PM
|
|
...if we aren't handicapped by green play callers
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [94490]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95650
Joined: 12/25/09
|
Peake?
Dec 15, 2014, 5:44 PM
|
|
Did he go pro cause I know you didn't leave our best WR out of that.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1577]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 970
Joined: 9/23/07
|
O line?
Dec 15, 2014, 7:20 PM
|
|
You mentioned all skill positions and no lineman. There lies the answer to your question; another off season of "if this O line can develop we can have a top ten offense".
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4444]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3616
Joined: 5/16/01
|
No - we still need a talented, nasty, and experienced OL***
Dec 15, 2014, 9:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6046]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3950
Joined: 1/10/04
|
Yes, once they get to the end zone they stop.***
Dec 15, 2014, 9:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [195]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 448
Joined: 9/10/14
|
Re: Yes, once they get to the end zone they stop.***
Dec 15, 2014, 10:34 PM
|
|
The bowl game will be the beginning, this offense will be a beast next year, the O-line will be nasty..... Competition breeds excellent
|
|
|
|
Replies: 23
| visibility 14
|
|
|