18 chatter(s) RIGHT NOW!  Go!    
 Mickey Plyler's Blog



Front Page
Sections
Football
Basketball
Baseball
Recruiting
InterActive
Forums
TgrActive Chat
T-Mail
Blogs
Edit Settings
Mem. Profiles
Tiger Poll
Features
Tiger Tickets
Multimedia
TigerNet Store

250 Baldwin Road,
Baldwin Pointe
Seneca, SC

Please take a moment to view the web commercial for this beautiful home at 250 Baldwin Road. You will not be disappointed!


Monday October 19, 2009

Wake Forest Review

Wake Forest Review
Saturday’s 38-3 win over Wake Forest was perhaps the most complete performance since the last time the Tigers beat the Deacons 44-10 in 2007. I thought the offense, defense and special teams all played as well as they have all season.

I think we all could make a legitimate argument on which side of the ball was more impressive but for those that point out the defense, I think tackling was one of the two biggest factors. Coach Swinney pointed this out Sunday after the film. I thought the open field tackling was much better including Kavell Conner’s best performance.

The other major factor on defense Saturday was pressure. Riley Skinner entered Saturday’s game with three consecutive games of more than 350 yard passing but the senior was hammered all day. Clemson had five sacks and eight quarterback hurries. By the end of the game Skinner’s jersey was a completely different color than the rest of his Wake Forest teammates.

Saturday was Da’Quan Bowers’ 19th game at Clemson and I think this was his best performance. He had four solo tackles, three tackles for loss, one sack and three quarterback hurries. Wake Forest had a difficult time handling the sophomore defensive tackle who actually cut his hair since the Maryland game but looked like a different player aside from his hair.

It was pretty obvious to me that Wake Forest had a hard time with the rest of the Clemson defensive line also. Rennie Moore and Jamie Cumbie combined on a sack. Ricky Sapp added another sack to his total this season. Wake ran 70 plays and 12 resulted in a tackle behind the line of scrimmage. Bowers had three tackles for loss. Cumbie had a couple. Sapp, Moore, Branch and Malliciah Gooman also had one each. This kind of pressure and penetration had the Deacs behind the chains and in bad down and distance situations the entire afternoon.

One of the surprising parts of this effort is that it came against perhaps the hottest offense in the league. Wake Forest came into the game averaging just 0.7 yards per game less than the ACC’s leading team in total offense, Georgia Tech.

The total team effort can also be attributed to the linebacker corps. I mentioned Connor’s open field tackling. He had eight tackles including 1.5 tackles for loss and a seven yard sack. Jonathan Willard was the team’s second leading tackler with seven including a tackle for loss. Brandon Maye had six tackle and true freshman Corrico Hawkins played the most snaps of his career and had a couple of tackles.

Some of those sacks were coverage sacks that came from an aggressive defensive gameplan and tremendous execution from the secondary. From the stands, it appeared to be one of the top performances by the secondary including DeAndre McDaniel’s very important interception in the first period.

The offense looked crisp as well. It looked like the offense got an injection of confidence after taking the opening kickoff and scoring first. Also, I don’t think you can underestimate the impact of getting seven points on that drive. The offense looked like it was in a rhythm all day and it started with the opening drive.

What else can you say about C.J. Spiller? Wake Forest tried to limit his touches by not kicking to him so Spiller made his difference as a tailback. The Deacs kicked off only twice all day and both were away from Spiller. They punted the ball out of bounds all day as well. So Spiller only touched the ball 11 times but he made them count. He had nine carries for 107 yards for two touchdowns including a 66-yard burst. It was that run that told me the game was out of hand and this one was going to be a Tiger victory. The run came one play after Wake scored to cut the lead to 17-3 and Spiller took any momentum away from the Deacs.

I thought Kyle Parker had one of his best games of the year especially running the football. He ran the zone read well and his touchdown off of the option was a thing of beauty. Parker made better decisions also. His 51-yard bomb to Jacoby Ford was a thing of beauty.

Speaking of beauty, the play calling had some different aspects that were easier on the eyes. I love the tight ends more involved in the gameplan. Michael Palmer had two catches on the opening drive including his touchdown catch. When was the last time you saw a tight end screen at Clemson? Put the screen to Dwayne Allen in the memory bank but hopefully it won’t be long before we see another one. The play calling even included a trick play from Jacoby Ford to Xavier Dye for 32 yards and a fullback carry in a short yardage situation.

The big improvement on offense came in the red zone. The Tigers had four trips into the red zone Saturday that resulted in three touchdowns and one field goal. Execution is the key here. A one-yard touchdown pass to Palmer would have been criticized if the play hard not been executed properly. Spiller’s 14-yard touchdown run came on a second down and 13 where the staff chose to run the ball. If the play had not worked then it would have been criticized.

I also liked how aggressive the staff was with their time outs at the end of the first half. The Tigers scored with 3:37 to go in the first half then used their time outs to get the ball back again and score with 66 second left in the first half to go up 31-3.

We also saw a bunch of young players play well Saturday. The Tigers started three freshmen on offense in Dalton Freeman, Dwayne Allen and Kyle Parker. Spencer Adams, Spencer Benton, Jonathan Meeks, Andre Ellington, Xavier Brewer, Rashard Hall, Carlton Lewis, Brandon Clear, Byron Clear, Corrico Hawkins, Tig Willard, Matt Sanders, Kenneth Page, Matt Skinner, Brandon Ford, Jaron Brown and Malliciah Goodman were the others to play to give the Tigers 20 freshmen that saw action Saturday.

The Brad Hughes All-State Insurance Agency









Prayer List
We have started a prayer list on the blog. Here are the guidelines:
*If you are offended by prayer or prayer lists then I apologize in advance. The blog is free and the prayer list will be on the bottom of the page so you don’t have to read it.
*If you would like to add someone to the list please e-mail me at mickeyplyler@hotmail.com
*If you want the reason for the prayer to be added to the name please specify in your e-mails.
*Please let me know when it is appropriate to take the person off of the prayer list

Those who need our prayers include:
Finn Brookover, Larry in Naples, FL, RTG-Pawsitive Tiger, Mary-Louise Pawlowski (John's daughter), Jo Ann Bachman, Frank Taylor, Kenneth Bryant, Pruitt Martin, Got igers and his family, David Rowland, Leonard Gillespie and his family, Jim S, Christine Hepfer, Daniel Rosborough, Amy Murphey, Jack Huffman, Nancy Winkler, Dr. Nancy Strom Morgan, John Reeve, Eileen Woodrum, Ethel Southard, Vinnie Brock, Jean-Pierre Bailey, Kaitlyn L, Delores Weaver, Eric Boessneck, John Bowers, Jimmy Ness, Susan Miller, Joyce Harley, Steve Proveaux, John Petrey, Chalmers Carr, Drayton Melton, Jeffrey Greene, the Hutto family, Sherl Drawdy, Caleb Kennedy, Ann Fallaw, Bob Pollock, Teresa O'Connor, Matt Jacobs, Mike Kingsmore.


Comments:

That was one of the best Tiger performances in a while. Maybe since the 31-14 USuC game, or the prior year WF game.

But all of the changes made by the offensive staff should have been done before the year. Coming into the year we knew we had three good TE's in Palmer, Allen, and Barry. And only one solid WR in Ford. So what does the staff do? they try to force the ball to the WR's at the expense of the TE's. Dumb. They knew the o-line sucked last year, so why not run more I formation and let Diehl block?

Why did it take a 2-3 start for the offensive staff to final get off their butts and start coaching and thinking this way?

Posted by DV_1981 on October 19, 2009 at 01:18 PM EDT #

After the pre-game blog I wrote...

"I'd expect Wake to load the box until Parker & Co. demonstrate a passing threat. Hopefully our passing game improved over the bye week."

It did. And Napier started the game with 4 straight passes and a TD, which kept Wake honest.

I also wrote:
"It'll be interesting to see if Clemson can hit the reset button and start playing up to their potential. With 2 weeks to prepare, everybody healthy, home field, and Dabo/Napier feeling some heat, I have a feeling that the Tigers could turn in a stellar performance."

It was indeed a stellar performance. If only THAT Clemson team had played against UMD. If THAT Clemson team plays against Miami, we have a good chance. VT beat Miami, largely by harassing Jacory Harris the way that we harassed Skinner.

Unfortunately, BC won, and VT's loss to GT may have inspired Miami to work harder this week. Probably single-elimination for both teams.

Harass Harris! Harass Harris! Harass Harris!

Posted by Razzmatazz on October 19, 2009 at 01:20 PM EDT #

DV: It does seem a shame that Napier took this long to adjust to his talent/results, but all will be forgiven if we win the ACC. :-)

There was definitely better execution-- which makes the play calling look better. But I think that the play-calling was better-- which helped make the execution easier. In addition to what you mentioned, it also seemed that Clemson rolled the O-line more on running plays, rather than only trying to go brute-force, mano-y-mano between the tackles, and mixed it up nicely to keep the D honest.

Also, obviously, for the last two weeks, they've been drilling Parker to pull it down and run when it's available. Ironically, Parker did to Wake, what slippery Skinner did to us last year. Parker looked more like Skinner than Skinner.

I hope they can keep it up.

Posted by Razzmatazz on October 19, 2009 at 01:48 PM EDT #

Out of curiosity, what level was the Wake defensive line compared to those who limited our O in the previous games?

How much better is the Miami D-line compared to Wake? Were we playing against a d-line as weak as our O line so our specialty backs could shine or was it really a better play calling by Napier?

I thought we looked great, but can only take it with who we were up against. To me, it seemed Wake was only mediocre, so we exploited that (our second half was not the prettiest).

Posted by RobertsonCU on October 19, 2009 at 02:04 PM EDT #

In regards to the time outs before the half, we have been wasting opportunities all year. No matter the score, try to score before the half using your 2 minute offense...next time it may be 2 minutes in the game and you need 7.

Posted by TigerGrad'93 on October 19, 2009 at 02:15 PM EDT #

Mick, Thanks for showing "Leon" such a good time this weekend. Good job!

Posted by Tigtim76 on October 19, 2009 at 03:31 PM EDT #

Skinner's jersey was ORANGE by the end of the game.

Posted by clemsongradanddad on October 19, 2009 at 03:38 PM EDT #

RobertsonCU: I think Wake's D-line would be considered better than Miami's, but Miami's LB's might be better run stoppers. I guess it depends which Miami D shows up-- the one that held GT to 95 yards rushing (228 total), or the one that gave up 272 yards rushing to VT. Miami's pass-D may be more vulnerable than their run-D.

Here's their D-stats...
http://hurricanesports.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2009-2010/teamcume.html#TEAM.DEF

I'm more worried about Miami's O-line. If they give Harris all day (like they did against FSU) he'll pick us apart. If they let him get harassed like they did against VT, we should be OK. It's a good, seasoned O-line.

Posted by Razzmatazz on October 19, 2009 at 05:15 PM EDT #

Razz,
The O-line won't give Harris all day if Thompson, Jenkins, Sapp and Bowers played like they did Saturday. But give Steele credit, he threw alot of different looks at Wake. Hopefully we won't change too much on the D-line vs. Miami.

Posted by Kinghunterx5 on October 20, 2009 at 08:07 AM EDT #

What a refreshing change we saw in the play of our team last Sat. I see no reason our coaches won't continue down that successful road we traveled last weekend. I see good things fr the Tigers. If we beat Miami, the confidence level will be very high, and success breeds success. I'm cautiously optimistic.

Posted by Dugatiger on October 21, 2009 at 09:58 PM EDT #

zZlzUP <a href="http://dlxqeoapbxgr.com/">dlxqeoapbxgr</a>, [url=http://vihympdititp.com/]vihympdititp[/url], [link=http://zqrizioekkbl.com/]zqrizioekkbl[/link], http://oqlkakxnvhtf.com/

Posted by 190.248.31.2 on October 28, 2009 at 11:23 PM EDT #

Q4FqQh <a href="http://lzppmblmwmbb.com/">lzppmblmwmbb</a>, [url=http://uqaxztsrbkfs.com/]uqaxztsrbkfs[/url], [link=http://kptvywdhtbxy.com/]kptvywdhtbxy[/link], http://clijwswxbwux.com/

Posted by 59.52.191.245 on October 29, 2009 at 11:56 AM EDT #

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

Archives
Search
Links



Front Page | Football | Basketball | Baseball | Recruiting
Account Settings | TigerActive Chat | TigerNet Forums | Tiger Tickets | T-Mail

Please mail any comments, corrections or suggestions
Disclaimer and Privacy Statement Copyright © 1995-2008 TigerNet

Interested in advertising on TigerNet?