
Wednesday May 30, 2007
Early Signing Period and Playoff System
Spring Meetings
The Atlantic Coast Conference and the Southeastern Conference schedule spring meetings in Amelia Island and Destin, FL respectively each year. These meetings are usually business meetings and most of the time they discuss some significant new ideas but few times do earth shattering changes come about.
This year might be different from other years. We may remember the 2007 ACC and SEC spring meetings as the most significant we have had in recent years. Both conferences have expanded since 1990 and those meetings helped to shape college athletics but this year the ramifications may reach further.
Two items have made their way to the forefront include an early signing period for football and a college football playoff system.
Early Signing Period
The ACC brought up the idea of an early signing period for football. Currently football has only one signing day and that occurs each year on the first Wednesday in February. Basketball, baseball, track and field, golf, etc. all have a fall signing period and a spring signing period. This allows coaches to concentrate on their seasons and it allows prospects that already know where they are going to sign with the school and get the headache out of the way.
I think an early signing period makes sense for football but not under the proposed plan the ACC has come up with. The conference has suggested a December date that would exist along side of the national junior college signing period. The JUCO players may sign then if they intend on enrolling in January following their graduation.
To me it makes more sense to have an August signing period in football. Clemson currently has nine football commitments and could have 14-15 by August. Florida State has 11, Georgia has 10 and Texas has 19. If these prospects know they want to sign with the schools where they have committed then they ought to be able to sign before their senior seasons.
What happens now is that schools continue to recruit these prospects despite their public commitment to a school. A December signing day means the hammering would continue throughout the fall and throughout their senior football season. If colleges could agree on a late August date then the player and their families could enjoy their senior season without getting hounded by college coaches. The pressure would be off of both sides. There would be no reason to call and pester the prospect if he is already signed to a school.
An early signing day would also allow college coaches to concentrate more on their seasons. I understand that they would have to intensify their junior recruiting because of the new date and they would still have to recruit players that have not made their minds up yet. The college coaches would still have to go through February with many kids but if you knew you were only taking two quarterbacks and signed two in August then you could drop the rest of the quarterbacks on your board. The reduced number of prospects would mean more time for other tasks.
A December date would not cut back on time with the exception of the month of January. Another advantage of an August date is the makeup time. If you find out you missed on your top targets in the August signing period then you would have until February to look for and continue to recruit other prospects at that position. If you waited until December then you only have a month to find others.
Playoffs
Florida president Bernie Machen brought up the idea of a national college football playoff at the SEC spring meetings this week. To my knowledge this is the first major college president to come out as a proponent of the playoff system.
Other presidents and chancellors have since made comments on the subject. That has lead to head coaches once again adding their two cents.
Speaking of cents, that is what will make the difference here. It makes sense but makes even more because it makes more dollars and cents.
Secondary education has become more about money in recent years and college presidents find themselves in the fundraising mode more often than ever before. Once the college presidents see how much more money a playoff system will generate then they will all fall in line.
Currently some presidents talk about how much they love the bowls because they see the money they currently make. But we all know that a college playoff system would generate more money. Would Budweiser want to spend money on the Motor City Bowl or a national playoff? Insight.com Bowl or College Football Final Four? The one with more viewers means the one with more advertisers. If you promised the presidents that they could double their money from the bowls if they converted to playoffs it would happen tomorrow. Now we just have to make it work.
Florida has won two basketball titles and one football title in the last 14 months and it is Florida’s president who is at the forefront. He saw the excitement generated by March Madness. He also saw the old bowl system. And despite the fact that Florida is a top 20 public institution its president wants a play off. Have you seen Florida’s budget? Have you seen their facilities? Sounds like a good business man to me.
A college football playoff is coming. They can’t hold it off forever because they are running out of ammunition. Furman and Wofford play I-AA playoffs each year and it doesn’t seem to devalue anyone ‘s degree. The attendance at bowl games have not gone up through the years and television ratings are not continuing to increase.
My guess is that we will start with the ‘Plus One” format which is essentially a four-team playoff. Remember the NCAA basketball tournament went from 16 teams to 32 teams to 48 teams to 64 teams to today’s number of 65. Four teams in football will eventually yield to eight and possibly 16 one day.
At least we are progressing towards two good changes in college football.
Mickey's Blog also brought to you by:

864-834-6060
The Brad Hughes All-State Insurance Agency
|
August early signing period.....for the other sports (virtually all of them) are their any early signing periods that actually exist before the start of a student athletes Senior year in HS? Fundamentally, wouldn't the NCAA and conferences be opposed to offering LOIs to be signed prior to the first day of high school (some of which don't start until after Labor Day)?
With the APR being a big talking point with the NCAA, it doesn't seem plausible to offer kids prior to any time elapsing in their 12th grade year.
Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=60052>Justwannaread</a> on May 30, 2007 at 12:07 PM EDT #
I answered my own question....earliest early signing date is Nov. 9th this year, for basketball and "all other sports".
http://www.national-letter.org/dates/
I just don't see it plausible in the least that the NLI program offers a singing date prior to a students senior year.
Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=60052>Justwannaread</a> on May 30, 2007 at 01:04 PM EDT #
I answered my own question....earliest early signing date is Nov. 9th this year, for basketball and "all other sports".
http://www.national-letter.org/dates/
I just don't see it plausible in the least that the NLI program offers a singing date prior to a students senior year.
Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=60052>Justwannaread</a> on May 30, 2007 at 01:12 PM EDT #
The NCAA and the schools have always had the opportunity for more money with a playoff system which is one reason I haven't been able to understand why the presidents push to keep modifying a broken system such as the BCS. Perhaps it is due to the rising costs of education as you pointed out and now they're being forced to look at more revenue options and a playoff isn't certainly their biggest $ option.
Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=8618>Orange</a> on May 30, 2007 at 02:43 PM EDT #
The NCAA and the schools have always had the opportunity for more money with a playoff system which is one reason I haven't been able to understand why the presidents push to keep modifying a broken system such as the BCS. Perhaps it is due to the rising costs of education as you pointed out and now they're being forced to look at more revenue options and a playoff isn't certainly their biggest $ option.
Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=8618>Orange</a> on May 30, 2007 at 02:45 PM EDT #
The NCAA and the schools have always had the opportunity for more money with a playoff system which is one reason I haven't been able to understand why the presidents push to keep modifying a broken system such as the BCS. Perhaps it is due to the rising costs of education as you pointed out and now they're being forced to look at more revenue options and a playoff isn't certainly their biggest $ option.
Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=8618>Orange</a> on May 30, 2007 at 02:46 PM EDT #
Justwannadoublepost
Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=35293>clemsonguy2</a> on May 30, 2007 at 03:36 PM EDT #
joker, joker, and a triple!!
Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=43088>tiger_swimmer</a> on May 31, 2007 at 12:26 AM EDT #
Mickey --
Were you serious about that free lunch??
Robertson.CU@gmail.com
Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=67061>RobertsonCU</a> on May 31, 2007 at 12:02 PM EDT #
RobertsonCU,
E-mail me at mickeyplyler@hotmail.com and let me know when you guys are available.
Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=1550>Mickey Plyler</a> on May 31, 2007 at 02:13 PM EDT #
nice try mickey...
after meeting with the rest of the SEC. the uf pres was quickly informed that the playoffs weren't the way to make money. so he has since changed his stance.
Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=66734>sregitog 1</a> on June 01, 2007 at 05:27 PM EDT #